Acoustics of closed spaces
May 14, 2020COVID-19 INJURY
May 16, 2020
Much is being written in this period on the topic both for and against.
It certainly gives guarantees and effectiveness against bacteria and viruses demonstrated by scientific literature.
There is a but.
What matters today, beyond the general indications on the use of ozone generators to sanitize environments, is the scientific evidence.
Faced with a possible causal link between ineffective disinfection/sanitization procedures and contagion, they count and detect:
the validated methods, the disinfectants used, the frequency, the knowledge (information/training), the procurement contract, the signs, the supervision.
The Bergamo prosecutor's office gives important indications that link the protocols, the covid-19 emergency and Legislative Decree 81/08. Below is an excerpt and the reader's comments:
"Correspondence with the provisions of Legislative Decree 81/2008
Regarding the finding of the precepts that correspond to the rules of Legislative Decree 81/08 and analyzing the measures provided for by the shared Protocol, only exemplary purpose the document from the Prosecutor's Office reports the following points:
- point 1 "INFORMATION” – “it is proposed to accuse the employer/manager of the violation of the art. 36 c. 2 lit. a): for not having ensured that each worker received adequate information on the specific risks to which he or she is exposed in relation to the activity carried out, the safety regulations and the relevant company provisions";
- point 4 "CLEANING AND SANITIZATION IN THE COMPANY” – “it is proposed to accuse the employer/manager of the violation of the art. 63 c. 1, in conjunction with art. 64 c. 1 letter d) and Annex. IV point 1.1.6.: for failing to keep the work premises clean and having the cleaning carried out";
- point 5 "PERSONAL HYGIENIC PRECAUTIONS” – “it is proposed to accuse the employer/manager of the violation of the art. 18 c. 1 letter f): for not having requested compliance by individual workers with the regulations in force, as well as with company provisions regarding safety and hygiene at work";
- point 6 "PERSONAL PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT” – “it is proposed to accuse the employer/manager of the violation of the art. in the event of failure to supply the PPE required by the shared Protocol. 18 c. I let. d): for not having provided workers with the necessary and suitable personal protective equipment, after consulting the manager of the prevention and protection service and the competent doctor, where present".
the link to the ministry of health can help remove some urban legends.
